Which Is It? Pope Francis Or Pope Benedict? Can't Be TWO POPES! LOL! Signed Mélanie

TWO POPES BLESSING CARDINALS......

Another distraught traditionalist that can't face up to reality of the TWO POPES:
If Benedict XVI had renounced the entirety of the Petrine Office, i.e. the contemplative and active ministry together, it could perhaps be argued that he is merely Pope Emeritus and is no longer a valid pope, but he argues emphatically against this, stating that he is pope "forever" and that he has resigned only the active ministry thereof. Yet there cannot exist two popes simultaneously. The idea of a "two-headed" pope or a "communal papacy" is heretical and foreign to anything Christ taught. It's either Francis or Benedict XVI. Which is it? Source
This is the best revenge. Just think of what the Envy of Popes did to the Divinely Ordained Authority of the Holy Roman Emperor over these last 1000 years or so. Done out of envy. Now the Papacy has won and the Emperor has been cast down and trampled under foot.

There are TWO to rule the world

1. Pope in Spritual
2. Emperor in Temporal

The Popes struck down the Emperor - you all suffer for it.

Now we have TWO POPES because there should be TWO RULERS to rule the world.

This is what you get when you have no EMPEROR.

Now from Mélanie:
"I didn't see, I don't see any Great Pope or Great Monarch before an extremely great tribulation, horrifying, terrible and general for all Christendom. But before that time, twice there will be a short lived peace; two shaky, servile, doubtful popes" Mélanie

MARIA OF THE CROSS, 
Victim of Jesus nee MELANIE CALVAT, 
Shepherdess of La Salette
"I protest highly against a different text, which people may dare publish after my death. I protest once more against the very false statements of all those who dare say and write First that I embroidered the Secret; second, against those who state that the Queen Mother did not say to transmit the Secret to all her people." Mélanie

Comments

  1. What harm did any pope ever do to any Holy Roman Emperor? What on earth are you talking about?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I post daily one chapter of Dante's de monarchia on Roman Catholic Imperialist - you can start there to read Dante on the war waged on the Roman Emperor by the Pope and his men.

      -I also post William of Ockham's defense of the rights of the Emperor that the Papacy has trampled
      under foot

      - I also post every year during Advent the warnings of all the church fathers on what hinders the manifestation of the Antichrist - the visible presence of the Holy Roman Emperor.

      So please take the time to read from Dante and Ockham and their defense of the Roman Emperor.

      Oh yes and I get your response to Ockham - "he is a heretic etc.." because he denied the reality of things etc... But here's the funny part (call it Ockham's revenge) THERE ARE TWO POPES which the lot of you deny - LOL!

      You deny the REALITY of the TWO POPES as you accused Ockham of denying the reality of things!

      Again LOL!

      Delete
    2. Dude. Seriously. Neither of those guys is the pope. They are both heretics, and a heretic can't be the Pope. What part of that do you not agree with?

      Delete
    3. maybe you should tell the TWO POPES that they are not TWO POPES! LOL!

      Delete
  2. Why would I do something so silly?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Silly? like visiting this blog! and silly like posting two comments - seems you're all about silly

      Delete
    2. Touché, my friend. :)

      Delete

Post a Comment