IT BEGINS! Rad Trad Convert Ann Barnhardt Pops The Question: "How Do We Raise An Army? We Have To Retake The Vatican, Retake Rome!

Rad Trad Ann Barnhardt uses the saints to justify her question:

How do we raise an Army?

We have to retake the Vatican, retake Rome!

At about the 10 minute mark. Source

Again I think its becoming clearer every day that it will be RAD TRADS who will fight under the banner of the forerunner to the Antichrist and will help form a Nationalist Army to murder the Fatima Pope and Faithful.

Ann will help the forerunner to raise a Nationalist Army:

A precursor of the Antichrist, with his troops drawn from many nations, will wage war against the true Christ, sole Savior of the world; he will shed much blood and will seek to annihilate the cult of God so as to be regarded as a god. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)

Ann will help the forerunner to the antichrist murder the Fatima Pope and Faithful:


The third part of the secret revealed at the Cova da Iria-Fatima, on 13 July 1917.

I write in obedience to you, my God, who command me to do so through his Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and through your Most Holy Mother and mine.

After the two parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: ‘Penance, Penance, Penance!'. And we saw in an immense light that is God: ‘something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it' a Bishop dressed in White ‘we had the impression that it was the Holy Father'. Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions. Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.


Milo is the forerunner to the Antichrist.....


  1. What is wrong with what Ann Barnhardt said? Of course a saint would want to raise an army to drive heretics out of Rome if they could.

    Liberals hate the idea of Catholics fighting to defend their faith, even though they themselves have forced liberalism on the world through widespread death and destruction.

    The Church has always used war to defend the Faith when other means failed, including, most notably, your favorite people in the world -- the Holy Roman Emperors. The first and greatest of them, Charlemagne, waged war against the Saxons and forced them to abandon paganism and stop attacking the Holy Roman Empire. His descendants waged the bitter 30 Years' War against protestantism in an attempt to drive that heresy from their borders, nearly permanently devastating Germany in the process, so desperate were they to defend the Faith.

    Later on the Church fought wars against Islam, called the Crusades. The greatest Crusader was a canonized saint -- St. Louis IX. His descendants later fought a war against the Albigensian heretics, and later on they waged war against the protestant Huguenots for centuries.

    The kings of Spain fought against the Muslims on their home turf, and later on when England was taken over by protestants they tried to assemble the Invincible Armada to invade England and restore the Faith.

    The popes themselves fought wars to defend the Papal States from unjust aggression, even from Catholic kings. Pope Julius II had to fight a war to defend the Papal States from the King of France, to the point of putting on a suit of armor and going into the battle line shouting, "Let's see who has bigger balls, the pope or the king of France!" Truth is stranger than fiction. Sadly, the Papal States fell to the armies of the freemasons under Pope Pius IX, who forbade the papal troops to fight since he knew they would have gotten completely massacred by the apostate Italian hordes of Garibaldi, even though he knew they were ready to die for him and for the papacy.

    God raised up St. John of Arc to fight against the English to protect France, knowing that the English would apostatize in 100 years or so and would have brought France into heresy with them if God didn't raise up St. Joan of Arc.

    Liberals hate the idea of fighting for the Truth, since they hate the Truth itself, but the Church has no such objection and has fought many wars in defense of the Faith. As I said, liberals are absolutely ruthless and bloodthirsty when it comes to forcing others to accept their beliefs.

    If a saint came back from the past and asked why we don't raise an army to set things right in Rome, as Ann says, the simple answer would be that we can't raise an army, and the only reason we haven't done so long ago is because such a thing has not been possible. Only a king or a ruler can raise an army, and there is no such person who is a traditional Catholic. The answer isn't that we think there's anything wrong with fighting for the Truth, as you say.

    That would be liberalism.

  2. More on St Joan here:

  3. So you agree that a Roman Emperor is needed to lead the fight and raise a Catholic Army?

  4. Well, obviously this question is purely hypothetical unless God works a miracle, but I don't see why a Roman Emperor would be the only person who could do this. Couldn't any truly Catholic ruler with the appropriate force expel the usurpers from the Vatican and bring about the election of a true pontiff?

    But I still don't know what your objection is to what Ann said. I agree with her that if someone were hearing about this situation for the first time their first idea would probably involve military intervention. Can you please explain why you mock this with an image of a drunken idiot with a gun surrounded by naked hookers?


Post a Comment